At a glance / Three queues after pages exist
| Correctness | Production consequence | Later edition |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong date or omitted word | Necessary addition moves a page break | Optional new metaphor |
| Resolve the error | Approve the dependencies | Retain without reopening this proof |
Pagination changes the question
Before pages exist, a revision can be judged mainly by the manuscript. After pagination, a sentence may move a line, a paragraph, a page, an index locator, or an illustration relation. That does not make correction impossible; it makes scope visible. Begin by naming the proof stage and the approved source copy. A proof is not an invitation to reopen every sentence that now feels writable.
Use three queues
Place each mark in one of three queues: correctness and omission; production consequence; later edition. A wrong date, missing word, broken cross-reference, or caption attached to the wrong image belongs in the first. A new paragraph that repaginates a chapter belongs in the second and needs an explicit schedule decision. A better metaphor or a newly remembered anecdote usually belongs in the third unless it repairs a material error.
Make each mark executable
A typesetter should be able to locate and apply a correction without deciphering intent. Anchor it to the printed page and the actual words, then state replacement or instruction. University of Virginia Press similarly distinguishes general notes from precise text changes and advises using book-page numbers rather than PDF sequence. Avoid a sticky note saying ‘awkward’: either supply approved replacement, turn it into a query, or defer it.
Work one consequential example
On page 217, an author wants to add a 45-word clarification. The first question is not whether the prose is good. Ask whether it corrects a fact; whether it displaces a page break; whether the index includes that passage; and whether a linked EPUB source must change too. If it is essential, approve it with those dependencies named. If it is optional, add it to the next-edition record. The triage preserves choice rather than pretending there is no cost.
Collate before forwarding
When author, editor, and proofreader mark the same proof, consolidate them into one resolved instruction set. CIEP notes that proof collators may need to judge conflicts while protecting quality, schedule, budget, and author relations. Record who made that decision and which source prevailed. After corrections return, sample the affected pages plus preceding and following pages; a clean correction can still create a new break or a dropped line nearby.
Keep corrections in one agreed markup method for the round. Mixed email instructions, screenshots, and handwritten amendments invite omissions even when each is sensible alone. If a late query cannot be settled, mark it visibly as unresolved and assign an owner before release. The proof record should show what was accepted, rejected, or deferred; silence should never be mistaken for approval of a consequential change.
Sources & limits
The right cut-off and authority for approval depend on the contract and production brief.
- Handling Proof
University of Virginia Press · Source undated · Consulted 19 Sept 2026Proof instructions distinguish book page numbers from PDF pages and recommend precise comment tools for specific text.
- Professional Practice Code
Chartered Institute of Editing and Proofreading · Source undated · Consulted 19 Sept 2026Proof collation can involve conflicting marks and requires justified judgements.
Send a correction with the passage and supporting source.

