A three-month strike ended with a ratification date, not a start date

UAW's own ratification announcement and the local's background page leave the walkout's first day unstated.

Historical event

February 21, 2023

First source published

February 17, 2023

Site publication

September 18, 2026

The record

On 17 February 2023 the UAW announced that HarperCollins Union members had ratified a new contract, ending what the union's own release calls a three-month strike against HarperCollins Publishers, a subsidiary of News Corp, with members returning to work on 21 February. The release quotes Local 2110 president Olga Brudastova on the settlement and states that Local 2110 members had been working without a contract since April 2022; it describes the unit as representing more than 250 employees across editorial, sales, publicity, design, legal, and marketing, and states that HarperCollins was, at that time, the only major U.S. book publisher with a unionized workforce. A companion page on the local's own site, archived during the dispute, describes the bargaining relationship's basic terms: a collective bargaining agreement effective through 31 December 2020 and subsequent signed extensions.

What the documents show

The two documents differ on how long the workplace has been organized: the UAW's February 2023 release states employees have had a union for more than 80 years, while the local's own page states the union there dates back over 60 years, with UAW affiliation for about 30. Neither cited document reconciles the difference, which may reflect different reference points, an earlier independent union predating UAW affiliation, for instance, rather than a factual conflict. Neither source gives the strike's specific start date; the three-month characterization and the February 21 return-to-work date are the two firm anchors the cited record supplies, placing the walkout's beginning in the preceding autumn without naming a day.

Why it stays interesting

This is an editorial note: the dispute is documented, in the union's own telling, as notable less for its length than for its rarity, a sustained strike at a major trade publisher where union representation itself is uncommon among the largest houses. For an editor or publishing employee elsewhere, the record establishes what one union achieved and named as its goal, without establishing whether comparable terms exist or are sought at unorganized peer publishers, a comparison the cited documents do not attempt.

What to read next

A reader could next check the ratified memorandum of agreement itself, posted on the local's site, for the specific terms reached, or the 2022 completion of the Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster litigation, which shows a different kind of publishing-industry dispute proceeding on a similar timeline.

• What specific wage, benefit, or scheduling terms did the ratified agreement change, beyond what the announcement summarizes?
• Can the two cited accounts' different tenure figures be reconciled, and does either source explain its basis?
• Has union representation spread to, or remained absent from, other major U.S. trade publishers since this settlement?

The union's own announcement dates the settlement precisely and the return to work exactly; what it and the local's background page leave open is the strike's own first day and a single, agreed account of how long the underlying union has existed.

Sources & reading trail

States the ratification, the three-month strike characterization, the return-to-work date, and unit size.

Source published: 17 February 2023 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

The local union's own background page on its bargaining history and prior contract terms, archived during the dispute.

Source published: Not established · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Reports, filings, records and studies establish the entry; the reading of why it stays interesting is Chapter Ledger editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.

Continue reading

• A blocked merger turned on advances, not bookstore shelves
• A pandemic-year revenue total hid two opposite stories
• Two publishers' own statements agree on one bounded merger
• Browse the complete the ledger archive

Published September 18, 2026, not on the date of the event described.