RETROSPECTIVE RECORD · PREPARED 16 SEPTEMBER 2026The ledger archive · 100 retrospective records ↗
Chapter LedgerBooks · writing · the life of an edition
← The ledger archive

Amazon began requiring authors to disclose AI-generated content

KDP's 2023 guidelines distinguish AI-generated from AI-assisted work and require disclosure only for the former.

Historical event
September 1, 2023
Site publication
September 18, 2026
Visual published with the cited source for this record: Amazon began requiring authors to disclose AI-generated content
Visual published with the cited source, shown for identification of the record. Credit: blogger.googleusercontent.com · source page ↗ Rights: owner-review-pending. Source

The record

By September 2023, Amazon's Kindle Direct Publishing self-publishing platform had added a requirement, absent from the guidelines as recently as mid-August that year, that authors disclose when a submitted book contains AI-generated text, images or translations. A Wayback Machine capture from 7 September 2023 of KDP's content guidelines page shows the new "Artificial intelligence (AI) content" section already in place, distinguishing AI-generated from AI-assisted content in terms that KDP's current guidelines page, retrieved 16 September 2026, still uses.

What the documents show

Both the 2023 snapshot and the current page state that KDP "require[s] you to inform us of AI-generated content... when you publish a new book or make edits to and republish an existing book," while stating plainly, "You are not required to disclose AI-assisted content." The guidelines define AI-generated content as text, images or translations "created by an AI-based tool," a category that applies "even if you applied substantial edits afterwards," and define AI-assisted content as work an author created and then had AI tools edit, refine, error-check or improve, or work for which AI was used only to brainstorm ideas the author then wrote. An August 2023 snapshot of the same page, by contrast, contains no artificial-intelligence section at all, which brackets the change to sometime between mid-August and early September 2023; the exact day of the change is not fixed by either document.

Why it stays interesting

The generated-versus-assisted line KDP drew turns on where the tool sat in the process, not on how much editing followed: content an AI tool created, however heavily revised afterward, counts as AI-generated and must be disclosed, while content a human wrote and an AI tool only polished does not. This is an editorial note: an author uncertain which category a given book falls into can apply that test, drawn directly from KDP's own wording, before relying on general intuitions about how much AI "help" is too much to go undisclosed.

What to read next

The Authors Guild's AI model contract clauses, drafted the same year for trade publishing agreements, address a related but distinct question, an author's own control over a publisher's use of AI, rather than a platform's disclosure requirement for self-published work.

A rule introduced without a press release, visible only by comparing snapshots of a help page taken weeks apart, still governs what hundreds of thousands of self-published authors must tell a platform about how a book was made.

Sources & reading trail

Shows the AI-generated/AI-assisted disclosure requirement already in place by 7 September 2023, absent from an August 2023 capture of the same page.

Source published: Not established · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Amazon's current guidelines page, describing the same AI-generated/AI-assisted disclosure requirement as retrieved 16 September 2026.

Source published: Not established · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Reports, filings, records and studies establish the entry; the reading of why it stays interesting is Chapter Ledger editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.

Continue reading

Sources & reading trail

The documents above establish the record. The reading and the questions are this publication’s editorial analysis, written after the fact.

Published September 18, 2026, not on the date of the event described.