RETROSPECTIVE RECORD · PREPARED 16 SEPTEMBER 2026The ledger archive · 100 retrospective records ↗
Chapter LedgerBooks · writing · the life of an edition
← The ledger archive

Librarians and publishers jointly adopted a statement in 1953

ALA's own text and AAP's 2023 anniversary release date the joint statement's adoption to 25 June 1953.

Historical event
June 25, 1953
First source published
June 25, 2023
Site publication
September 18, 2026
Visual published with the cited source for this record: Librarians and publishers jointly adopted a statement in 1953
Visual published with the cited source, shown for identification of the record. Credit: ala.org · source page ↗ Rights: owner-review-pending. Source

The record

The Freedom to Read Statement, as ALA's own page presents it, 'was originally issued in May of 1953 by the Westchester Conference of the American Library Association and the American Book Publishers Council,' and was formally 'adopted June 25, 1953, by the ALA Council and the AAP Freedom to Read Committee.' The page notes the publishers' body later consolidated, in 1970, with the American Educational Publishers Institute to become the Association of American Publishers. The statement opens: 'The freedom to read is essential to our democracy. It is continuously under attack.' ALA's page records four subsequent amendments, on 28 January 1972, 16 January 1991, 12 July 2000 and 30 June 2004, and lists later endorsers including the Freedom to Read Foundation and the National Coalition Against Censorship. An AAP press release dated 25 June 2023, the statement's seventieth anniversary, confirms the same origin and reports that ALA and AAP, joined by the Authors Guild and the American Booksellers Association, called on the book community to reaffirm the statement that day.

What the documents show

The two sources corroborate each other precisely on the adoption date, AAP's 2023 release marking the anniversary on the same day ALA's page cites as the 1953 adoption date, which strengthens confidence in 25 June 1953 over the looser 'May of 1953' drafting reference also present in the text. What the sources do not do is describe the drafting sessions themselves in any detail; both describe the statement's issuance and its later history of amendment and reaffirmation rather than the internal debate that produced its language.

Why it stays interesting

A statement jointly issued by librarians and publishers, then periodically amended rather than reissued from scratch, models a particular kind of institutional durability: the text stays recognizably the same document across seven decades while its list of endorsers and its amendment dates accumulate around it. This is an editorial point, but it is a useful one for reading any long-lived joint statement: the amendment history is itself part of the record, not a footnote to it.

What to read next

A reader could check the entry on the 1982 founding of Banned Books Week, which dramatizes the same freedom-to-read argument three decades later, or the 1876 founding of the American Library Association for the institutional origin of one of the statement's two original signatories.

The record supports a May 1953 drafting reference, a 25 June 1953 adoption date corroborated by both organizations' own pages, and four later amendments; it does not, on the sources inspected, reproduce the internal drafting debate, and a reader wanting that history should look to the organizations' own archived committee records rather than these summary and anniversary pages.

Sources & reading trail

ALA's own text of the statement, its May 1953 issuance and 25 June 1953 adoption dates, its four amendment dates, and its list of endorsing organizations.

Source published: Not established · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

AAP's own 70th-anniversary press release, dated 25 June 2023, corroborating the statement's 1953 origin and recording its 2023 reaffirmation by four organizations.

Source published: 25 June 2023 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Reports, filings, records and studies establish the entry; the reading of why it stays interesting is Chapter Ledger editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.

Continue reading

Sources & reading trail

The documents above establish the record. The reading and the questions are this publication’s editorial analysis, written after the fact.

Published September 18, 2026, not on the date of the event described.